Comité Surveillance OTAN
The Russian threat: NATO''s war sham

Screenshots of pages ’News’ of Microsoft, published day after day: "Russia''s diabolical plan for the downfall of the West ", "The Baltic States, Putin''s first target ?", "France trembles : Putin''s gladiators threaten to invade the Paris Olympics", "Putin wants to invade other countries : the decision would have already been made", etc...

"Russia almost certainly does not want a direct military conflict with U.S. and NATO forces and will continue asymmetric activity below what it calculates to be the threshold of military conflict globally." That''s what it says in black and white in the US intelligence community''s official annual "threat assessment" report.

You read that right: "Russia certainly does not want a military conflict", and this is not the propaganda of Putin''s paid trolls.

What then is the meaning of these statements by Western leaders warning in unison of the threat of Russian attack on Europe? "If we leave Ukraine alone, if we let Ukraine lose this war, then Russia will certainly threaten Moldavia, Romania and Poland," asserts Macron. "A Russian victory in Ukraine would be fraught with threats for its European neighbors," added Ursula von der Leyen.

The militarization of the European Union is not going fast enough in the eyes of NATO''s war-mongering leaders.

the so-called Russian threat. The whole of society is being urged to "switch to a war economy", and the misappropriation of public funds for the benefit of gun merchants is becoming enormous. A major European loan of 100 billion euros is announced, "to strengthen defense". Several EU countries, led by France and Germany, are pushing for the European Investment Bank to finance the defense industry, in violation of its own statutes.

But preparing minds for war is clearly not progressing as these leaders would like. While it''s quite clear that "Russia certainly doesn''t want a military conflict", several Western leaders, faced with the Ukrainian catastrophe, seem to be seriously considering this option. "If the situation deteriorates, we''ll be ready so that Russia never wins," says Macron. "Ukraine must win. Russia must be defeated. Russia must be destroyed" hammered his Latvian counterpart.

The war-mongers'' confidence is based on NATO''s material superiority over Russia: "We don''t have a great power facing us. (...) [Russia''s] GDP is much lower than that of the Europeans, lower than that of Germany or France", says Macron. And it is factually right - demonstrating the inconsistency of the "threat of a Russian attack": the defense budget of the Nato countries is 1,200 billion euros. 14 times that of Russia. The population of the European Union alone is 3 times that of Russia.

The war propaganda spouted day after day gives Russia and its leaders a distorted, monstrous, delirious image. It aims preparing minds for war.

We must realize that long-term peace in Europe and the world will not come from the desire to maintain the domination of one side over the other at all costs; it will not come from the destruction of the "enemy", today Russia, tomorrow China, "systemic challenge of NATO". Peace can only be achieved if we recognize that the security concerns of the "other" are legitimate. There can be no long-term security in Europe as long as the security of the other side is scornfully denied.

 

 Recherche...